Federal Research Funding for Colleges and Universities: The Role of Indirect Costs

June 12, 2019

Share this

Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs have received ongoing scrutiny from President Trump and Congress during the annual budget and appropriations process.

The president has regularly called for caps to be placed on F&A reimbursements for research grants, particularly for National Institutes of Health and Department of Agriculture grants. Congressional appropriators have generally overruled the president’s requests; however, his proposals do have some support.

To help you talk about the issue with your members of Congress and campus community, this short video charts the relationship between colleges and universities and federal research agencies and the very necessary expenses that often fall under the “indirect cost” umbrella.

Also see:

Excellence in Research: The Funding Model, F&A Reimbursement, and Why the System Works
Council on Government Relations


If you have any questions or comments about this blog post, please contact us.

Keep Reading

Crossing Borders: Helping Colleges and Universities Jumpstart the Conversation on Diversity and Inclusion

A major challenge confronting U.S. colleges and universities today is the need to disentangle the complexities of diversity, social justice and free speech. We talked to Crossing Borders Education founder Arnd Wächter about his organization and its work promoting dialogue as a way to build diversity and inclusion.

March 22, 2017

Moving Away From Data Invisibility at Tribal Colleges and Universities

The invisibility of Native American perspectives—those of Native students, researchers and their communities—continues to plague higher education, despite numerous calls for action from educational advocates across the country. Christine Nelson of the University of Denver considers what can be done to solve this problem.

November 20, 2017

Will Performance-Based Funding Further Disadvantage Disadvantaged Students?

Performance-based funding (PBF) is becoming increasingly popular as an accountability tool to reward higher education institutions for specific student outcomes. Despite its popularity, however, a substantial body of empirical evidence shows PBF can have troubling and unintended impacts. With this in mind, Lyle McKinney and Linda Serra Hagedorn look at the Texas Student Success Points Model.

March 24, 2015