New Report Finds Minority Students Face Equity Gap at Certain Public Institutions

November 28, 2018

Share this

Title: Our Separate and Unequal Public Colleges: How Public Colleges Reinforce White Racial Privilege and Marginalize Black and Latino Students

Author: Anthony P. Carnevale, Martin Van Der Werf, Michael C. Quinn, Jeff Strohl, Dmitri Repnikov

Source: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce

A recent report from the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce (CEW) asserts that admissions practices and growing funding gaps are splitting the public higher education system into two unequal tracks separated by race.

The report reveals that while black and Latino students made up 36 percent of the college-age population in 2015, they represented only 19 percent of the students attending selective public colleges. The findings also show that the enrollment increase of white students at public selective institutions over the past decade was more than the enrollment of black and Latino students combined. Furthermore, the representation of black students at selective public colleges increased only 1 percentage point from 2005 to 2015.

While the share of Latino students at these institutions increased, Latinos are less than halfway to parity in terms of representation in selective public colleges (12 percent to their respective 21 percent of the college-age population). The only state that has succeeded in matching the proportion of Latinos in selective public colleges with the college-age Latino population was Florida.

Graph of minorities underrepresented at selective public colleges

 

The authors contend that states compound access and enrollment disparities by giving more resources to selective public colleges than open-access institutions. In 15 states, selective public colleges received at least double the amount of public appropriations per student than open-access schools. Given the significant earnings boost by attaining a bachelor’s degree, they argue this issue is not just a matter of equity, but also a determining factor in the future of the U.S. workforce and economy.

To address issues of racial equity, the authors suggest that colleges and universities consider how they use standardized test scores in admissions and work toward enrollment that better reflects the state’s college-age residents. They also recommend allocating more state and federal funds for education at open-access institutions.

To read the summary and the full report, see the CEW website.

—Jinann Bitar


If you have any questions or comments about this blog post, please contact us.

Keep Reading

Minority Serving Institutions Perform Better Than Federal Graduation Rates Suggest

A new report out from ACE’s Center for Policy Research and Strategy aims to provide a more complete picture of the contributions MSIs make to the higher education landscape and the communities in which they reside. The upshot: Ensuring the success of students of color requires further investment in the very institutions that educate them.

July 26, 2017

How Predominantly Black Institutions Help Low-Income, First-Generation African American Students Succeed

Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs) are not well understood in the higher education lexicon, despite serving a large number of students of color: namely, a large number of black or African Amer­ican students. Robert T. Palmer and Jared Avery of Howard University look at the role of PBIs in facilitating access and success for low-income, first-generation students of color.

October 16, 2017

Minority Serving Institutions and STEM: Acting Intentionally, Increasing Effectiveness

ACE Vice President Lorelle L. Espinosa, who co-chaired the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s committee on Minority Serving Institutions, writes that the most successful STEM programs are multidimensional and intentional, addressing the academic, financial, and social aspects of the student experience.

June 3, 2019